By Amy C. Merrill Willis
This learn of the publication of Daniel examines the ideology of divine and human rule in Daniel's old resumes or reports present in chaps 2, 7, eight, nine, 10-12. It seeks to discover the worries that encourage the resumes and the innovations the resumes use to unravel cognitive and experiential dissonance. free Ends argues that the resource of dissonance in Daniel stems no longer from failed prophecies (as has been mostly argued), nor do the visions functionality as symbolic theodicies to deal with a contradiction among divine strength and divine goodness within the face evil. The research proposes, as an alternative, that the historic resumes tackle profound contradictions touching on divine energy and presence within the face of Hellenistic/Seleucid rule. those contradictions achieve a main issue aspect in Daniel 8's depiction of the desecration of the temple (typically Daniel eight is visible as a terrible copy of the victorious imaginative and prescient of divine energy present in Daniel 7). This problem of divine absence is addressed either in the imaginative and prescient of chap eight itself after which within the following visions of chaps nine, and 10-12, by utilizing narrative (both mythological narrative and ancient narrative).
Read Online or Download Dissonance and the Drama of Divine Sovereignty in the Book of Daniel PDF
Similar old testament books
A up to date string of popular-level books written through the hot Atheists have leveled the accusation that the God of the outdated testomony is not anything yet a bully, a assassin, and a cosmic baby abuser. This standpoint is even making inroads into the church. How are Christians to answer such accusations? and the way are we to reconcile the doubtless disconnected natures of God portrayed within the testaments?
"Subversive Scribes and the Solomonic Narrative" seeks, partly, to give a contribution to the continued dialogue via investigating the Solomonic narrative in the course of the optics of propaganda and, in particular, subversion. because prior experiences have already given substantial awareness to the propagandistic power of assorted features of the Solomonic narrative, Seibert's booklet explores examples of scribal subversion in "1 Kings" 1-11.
This e-book includes a re-creation of the scroll that represents an early revision of the Septuagint towards a better correspondence with the Hebrew textual content of the Bible. After an intensive creation, the amount presents the textual content with and with no reconstructions, notes on palaeography and reconstructions, and a remark on translation strategy, orthographic peculiarities, and textual kin.
This significant paintings re-examines prophecy and the prophets in historical Israel, with essays ranging all of the means from Israel's historical close to japanese history correct as much as the recent testomony. nearly all of essays pay attention to prophecy and the prophets within the outdated testomony, that are approached from a outstanding variety of varied angles.
- Hezekiah and the Books of Kings : A Contribution to the Debate about the Composition of the Deuteronomistic History
- The Samaritan Pentateuch: An Introduction to Its Origin, History, and Significance for Biblical Studies
- Proverbs (Old Testament Guides)
- Interpreting Habakkuk as Scripture: An Application of the Canonical Approach of Brevard S. Childs
- Be Basic. Believing the Simple Truth of God's Word
Extra info for Dissonance and the Drama of Divine Sovereignty in the Book of Daniel
Lemaire; Boston: Brill, 2006), 227. 128. Mark Turner, The Literary Mind (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996). 129. , v (emphasis original). 130. Hayden White, “The Narrativization of Real Events,” Critical Inquiry 7 (1991): 795; Jameson, Political Unconscious, 13. 131. This understanding of historiography runs along rails that diverge somewhat from the historiographical principle used by J. Huizinga and biblical scholars such as John Van Seters. Huizinga de¿ned historiography as “the intellectual form in 1 30 Dissonance and the Drama of Divine Sovereignty the process by which these events are made meaningful or achieve coherence that is important for my purposes.
43, which is not in the vision report and refers to the mixed marriage between the Seleucids and the Ptolemies. E. marriage between Cleopatra and Ptolemy V. See further Ginsberg, Studies in Daniel, 8; Montgomery, Daniel, 96; Polak, “Aramaic Literary Milieu,” 263–64; Davies, “Daniel Chapter Two,” 397–98. Reinhard Kratz, Translatio Imperii: Untersuchungen zu den Aramaischen Danielerzahlungen und ihrem theologiegeschichtlichen Umfeld (Neukirchen–Vluyn: Neukirchener, 1991), 71–72, adopts the idea of the third-century redaction but understands the toes to be a Maccabean insertion.
31 resolution of that conÀict within the future, or within the realm of anticipation. ”137 For Kermode, the ending is the point at which contradictions emerging in the narrative are often resolved and loose ends tidied up. From this point, one may look back on the narrative or the experience and view it as an intelligible whole. Daniel’s historical résumés constitute con¿gured time. As such, the résumés should be read as having the same abilities to establish consonance and coherence. The problem for Daniel is not quite the same as it is for Ricoeur, who sees temporal experience itself as the problem needing resolution.