By Mary Katharine Ham
Of the main recognizable and influential younger conservatives within the American media at the present time tackle the "Outrage Industry," revealing how the Left exploits wedge matters and faux outrage to silence their political rivals, aiding readers to chop throughout the noise and locate their voices back.
Read or Download End of Discussion: How the Left’s Outrage Industry Shuts Down Debate, Manipulates Voters, and Makes America Less Free (and Fun) PDF
Best conservatism & liberalism books
Neo-liberalism is without doubt one of the so much influential ideologies because the moment global warfare, but little learn has been dedicated to the circulate of rules that represent its major physique of concept. This e-book fills the void, supplying an unique account of neo-liberalism's highbrow foundations, improvement, and conceptual configuration as an ideology.
Denmark is likely one of the such a lot innovative international locations when it comes to kin aid guidelines. This publication, even though, finds a backdrop of reduced rights, inequalities and relations violence within the lives of weak lone moms. if that is so in Denmark, what's the state of affairs in different nations, together with the us, the united kingdom and different european member states?
No conception is extra passionately and largely outlined, or decried, than is liberalism in modern Anglo-American philosophy. yet what is that this thought, on which lots ink is spilled? This choice of unique essays by way of top experts in political philosophy, felony conception, and economics bargains solutions to that query, through exploring the theoretical commitments of liberals and a few of the sensible implications in their view.
The classics of Western tradition are out, now not being taught, changed by way of second-rate and 3rd global texts. White men are a victimized minority on campuses around the state, due to affirmative motion. Speech codes have silenced a person who won’t toe the liberal line. Feminists, wielding their model of sexual correctness, have taken over.
- The Wizards of Ozymandias
- Blood in the Sand: Imperial Fantasies, Right-Wing Ambitions, and the Erosion of American Democracy
- Perfection, the State, and Victorian Liberalism
- On Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism
- Misunderestimated: The President Battles Terrorism, John Kerry, and the Bush Haters
- Fighting Words: A Tale of How Liberals Created Neo-Conservatism
Additional resources for End of Discussion: How the Left’s Outrage Industry Shuts Down Debate, Manipulates Voters, and Makes America Less Free (and Fun)
Let’s try this thought experiment: Please tell us what’s offensive about the phrase “binders full of women,” employed by Republican nominee Mitt Romney in an October 2012 presidential debate. As a refresher, Romney was touting his documented track record of hiring women to high-ranking positions when he uttered the offending phrase. He explained that he used binders filled with qualified women’s résumés for his gubernatorial cabinet after his first round of recruitment was male dominated. ” Seriously, tell us what is offensive about that.
Sometimes people do say things that are beyond the pale. Sometimes people do need to lose their jobs. But in the vast majority of cases, the appropriate response to opinions that offend or annoy is to offer more speech—rebuttals, refutations, counter-arguments, and expressions of disagreement. “I’LL DEFEND TO THE DEATH YOUR RIGHT TO SAY IT…” According to the Internet, which is unfailingly accurate, the oft-invoked axiom “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it” is credited to Voltaire.
Media circuses and “things” may appear chaotic to the untrained eye, but they’re often intricately choreographed events, led by designated ringmasters. In the political realm, a network of well-trained operatives, nonprofits, special interests, PR firms, universities, “thought leaders,” and the media stand at the ready to manufacture and amplify fury over pretty much anything, or nothing at all. One of the most useful things about employing the entirely subjective “offense” of the listener to draw the limits of acceptable speech is that literally anything can be offensive to someone.