By Thomas M. Meagher
This first a part of a two-volume sequence examines intimately the financing of America’s significant wars from the yankee Revolution to the Civil warfare. It interweaves analyses of political coverage, army procedure and operations, and warfare finance and fiscal mobilization with examinations of the occasions of America’s significant armed conflicts, providing valuable case stories for college students of army background and spending coverage, policymakers, army comptrollers, and officials in training.
Read or Download Financing Armed Conflict, Volume 1: Resourcing US Military Interventions from the Revolution to the Civil War PDF
Best war & peace books
In fresh a long time the realm has skilled the increase of so-called 'low depth conflicts'. in contrast to traditional wars those very bloody armed conflicts are not any longer the affair of country governments and their armies. of their position look police-like armed devices, safety prone and mystery companies, teams and firms of spiritual, political and social fans able to inn to violence, 'militias', bands of mercenaries, or simply gangs of thugs, led via the condottiere of the twenty first century, which include militant charismatics, defense force 'generals', 'drug barons', and 'warlords' of varied varieties.
This booklet examines the concept that of legitimacy because it can be used to give an explanation for the luck, or failure, of key balance operations because the finish of the chilly battle. within the good fortune of balance operations, legitimacy is vital. to be able to be successful, the intervening strength needs to create a feeling of legitimacy of the project one of the quite a few constituencies serious about and excited by the enterprise.
This paintings examines neighborhood possession in UN peacekeeping and the way nationwide and foreign actors have interaction and proportion accountability in fragile post-conflict contexts summary: This paintings examines neighborhood possession in UN peacekeeping and the way nationwide and foreign actors have interaction and percentage accountability in fragile post-conflict contexts
- Education and Peace
- The Chechen Struggle Independence Won and Lost
- The BRICs Superpower Challenge: Foreign and Security Policy Analysis
- Conflict Management for Security Professionals
- Conflict After the Cold War: Arguments on Causes of War and Peace
- How Generations Remember: Conflicting Histories and Shared Memories in Post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina
Extra info for Financing Armed Conflict, Volume 1: Resourcing US Military Interventions from the Revolution to the Civil War
26 To that end, in Corbett’s opinion, there was a fundamental difference between land and naval warfare: “Land warfare is about the control of territory—economic pressure only occurs through victory or acquired domination (dimension of time). Military communications refer solely to the army’s line of supply and retreat. ”27 In other words, while a decisive battle would be welcomed, a country does not need it to command the sea. If a country can control the choke points, much as the Royal Navy had been able to accomplish, and establish overseas bases, this would imply command of the sea.
This is not to say that Mao did not have an appreciation of the role of economics in warfare; as illustrated above, he was keenly aware of the differences between the Soviet and Chinese economies, and their roles in successful revolutions. As late as the Korean War, Mao demonstrated his regard for the strategic role of economics in armed conflict; one of the major reasons for the massive Chinese intervention in the war was the threat posed by United Nations forces to northeastern China or more specifically Manchuria, where most of China’s heavy industrial capability was located.
MEAGHER web of existing economic relationships between adversaries and neutrals. 47 The American experience in the War of 1812 and the British experience in World War One have already been cited as examples of the difficulties these relationships can pose in a wartime environment. More recent examples include the sanctions program against Iran in response to that country’s continued efforts to develop a nuclear weapon; another is that of the Russian annexation of the Crimea. The United States responded by issuing sanctions not against Russia itself but rather against wealthy individuals who had publicly supported the move.